AI and Tips to Prevent Garbage In Garbage Out (GIGO)
Stuck cleaning data 80% of the time and analyzing just 20%? Break the GIGO cycle and boost your HR impact!
.webp)
One of the subscribers to AI in HR Today wrote back to me and identified the one opportunity and challenge they had regarding AI in HR. They wrote, “the biggest opportunity for me at this time is automating workflows and ensuring clean and accurate data sets.” I will touch upon automation in a future article, but I often get the question about the challenge around GIGO, aka garbage in and garbage out. This is where the data put into these systems is not “clean,” and thus, the output is “garbage.” I provide ways to prevent the “garbage in garbage out” problem in this article.
AI in HR Today
with Anthony Onesto
Subscribe for exclusive insights from Anthony Onesto, Chief People Officer at Suzy, and learn how AI is reshaping HR, enhancing employee engagement, and driving business success.
TOGETHER WITH
Let's look at the numbers:
- Financial Impact: According to Gartner, poor data quality costs organizations an average of $15 million per year
- Decision-Making Concerns: A Forbes Insights and KPMG report reveals that 84% of CEOs are concerned about the quality of the data they're basing their decisions on
- Revenue Loss: Businesses with lower data quality can lose around $3.1 trillion in the U.S. alone, or 20% of their overall value
HR departments often grapple with data quality challenges contributing to the GIGO problem. These include duplicate records, which can skew metrics, lead to inaccurate workforce insights, and incomplete data, resulting in partial analyses and incorrect conclusions. Outdated information is another significant issue, as using old data can result in decisions misaligned with the current workforce state. Furthermore, inconsistent data formatting and inaccuracies introduced through human errors or faulty data integration can propagate through the entire HR system, compromising its integrity.
The consequences of poor data quality in HR are far-reaching and can significantly impact organizational success. Flawed human capital decision-making is a primary concern, as HR decisions based on inaccurate data can lead to poor business outcomes. Employee morale and retention can also be affected, as incorrect data directly impacts employee satisfaction and trust. Legal and compliance risks arise when poor data quality leads to non-compliance with legal requirements, potentially resulting in penalties and reputational damage. Operational inefficiencies are another significant implication of the GIGO problem in HR. Studies have shown that approximately 80% of the overall analysis process in HR is spent on cleaning or preparing data, leaving only 20% for actual analysis.
This inefficiency wastes valuable time and increases the workload on HR staff. Moreover, inaccurate HR data can lead to strategic misalignment between HR strategies and organizational goals, hindering the organization's ability to adapt to market changes and maintain competitiveness.
Organizations and HR teams can implement several strategies to combat the GIGO problem and ensure high-quality HR data. These strategies are crucial for maintaining data integrity and improving decision-making processes:
- Data centralization and synchronization: Integrate data from various sources into a centralized system to ensure consistency and accuracy.
- Regular data audits: Conduct periodic audits to identify and correct errors before they impact decision-making. While having humans in the loop here is essential, AI could eventually play an important role, surfacing data that seems incorrect or outside specific parameters.
- Standardized data entry processes: Implement standardized procedures to reduce errors and improve overall data quality.
- Training and awareness programs: Educate HR staff about the importance of data quality and best practices in data management.
- Advanced analytics tools: Leverage modern HR analytics platforms and data quality management tools to improve data accuracy and reliability. In some cases your platform would have services or free tools to help with data accuracy.
- Data governance framework: Establish a framework that outlines roles, responsibilities, and processes for managing data quality.
- Continuous monitoring: Implement ongoing data monitoring to ensure compliance with data quality standards and address anomalies quickly. This is another area where AI could be incredibly useful.
By addressing the GIGO challenge head-on, HR departments can significantly improve the quality of their data and, consequently, the effectiveness of their decision-making processes and any future AI implementation. High-quality HR data unlocks the ability for AI to surface information that can be used to make strategic decisions that have a positive business impact. Implementing these strategies requires a commitment to data quality at all levels of the organization. Organizations should remain open to adopting new tools and methodologies to enhance data quality as technology evolves. This might include exploring AI-driven data validation tools or blockchain technology for secure and transparent data management. Clean data is going to be critical to effective AI use in HR.
It's essential to foster a culture that values accurate and reliable data, recognizing its critical role in driving informed decisions. HR leaders need to be champions of the cause of data quality, emphasizing its importance in achieving organizational goals and maintaining a competitive edge in the market. While it's hard to focus on data quality, given the number of tasks in the day-to-day in HR, having a strong data quality focus will help in the short and long terms.
AI in HR Today
with Anthony Onesto
Subscribe for exclusive insights from Anthony Onesto, Chief People Officer at Suzy, and learn how AI is reshaping HR, enhancing employee engagement, and driving business success.